Firestone and ford the tire tread separation tragedy

The Tire Tread Separation

Firestone and ford the tire tread separation tragedy

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Firestone and Ford: Because they did not take proper actions to eliminate the number of this cases and remove all dangerous products from the market timely, even if they knew that something was wrong, it lead to injuries, rollovers and even deaths.

In this work I tried to investigate what were the reasons of this crisis, what action, that caused this scandal, had been undertaken or had not been undertaken, who were those that influenced it and who is responsible for injured people.

Thus, disputable questions appeared with regard to the question, who is morally responsible and whose mistake lead to such numerous fatalities and injuries. Reasons of tire tread. Firestone tires were made with taking into considerations specifications of Explorer Moll, Later this decision will be considered as one of the factors that influenced tire tread separation.

The design of Ford explorer also could be the reason that lead the car to roll over, because of the not equally distributed weight.

Firestone and ford the tire tread separation tragedy

Also it is considered that manufacturing problems could reduce the quality of produced tires. For example, on Decatur plant, Illinois. This plant was very important for Firestone because it was its third largest plant and one of every produced tires were returned after tread separation by The higher failure rate is referred to the times when the company was facing strikes.

However the consequences of tire tread separations and car accidents that already happened were irresistible, both companies could react faster to prevent further injuries and somehow save their image and brand.

The number of serious injuries and deaths could be reduced, if the companies did not try to keep in secrecy that their products could be dangerous.

Who can edit:

Thus, they would earn less money, but saved images of the companies. In Octoberthey recalled additional 3,5 million tires. The actions were taken by both companies onwere almost the same hours hotlines, websites, conferencing, and etc. They tried to convince customers, that their safety is the main priority for now.

Ford was trying to show that they are putting their efforts to improve the situation and reduce the number of dangerous tires. Also two promises were made: However, Ford agreed with the problems with tires, it strongly denied any mistakes in the Explorer, when Firestone issued report and press release, where blamed both companies for design of tires and vehicle.

Consumers are the primary social stakeholders of both companies, and their stake is the right to have acceptable quality of the bought product. Customers usually have the highest legitimacy rate, because companies have direct interest in them.

In this case, thinking about the revenue, Ford and Firestone forgot about that. The quality is crucial for automobile vehicle, where negligence can lead to severe accidents. NHTSA and government have the power and legitimacy to influence the production process.

While Firestone and Ford were secretly settling cases, plaintiff attorneys were working to unveil the truth about the tire tread separation tragedies. Plaintiffs, using the civil justice system, sounded the alarm and began the process of holding the companies legally accountable for their actions. View Notes - The Firestone and Ford Case (1) from BMA at Tasmania. I FIRESTONE AND FORD: THE TIRE TREAD SEPARATION TRAGEDY It is often tricky to know when an ethical or social issue. This created friction between Ford and Firestone after last year's recall, with Firestone insisting that the low pressure had increased the heat on the tires and caused the tread separations. Ford engineers could hardly wait to replace the Explorer's outmoded front suspension.

NHTSA is responsible for tracking a production and performance of automobiles and its components. It was the NHTSA responsibility to regulate and prevent tire tread separation cases, because signs that something is wrong with this item, that leads to injuries and death, appeared years before their investigation.

Budget cuts, decreased regulatory authority, and outdated testing standards were the reasons why NHTSA was not able to control the situation. While the audience counted only Firestone to be guilty, a former director of NHTSA argued that both companies were guilty.

The regulatory power of NHTSA were increased and the budget was increased to improve their ability to control automobile production. And to prevent future failures National Highway Transportation Safety Agency was allowed by Congress and President to change its own policies. All of the factors, such as instability of Explorer, inflation rate in tires, labor and strikes influences, are interrelated, that is why it is hard to identify whose fault was it and who is morally responsible.While Firestone and Ford were secretly settling cases, plaintiff attorneys were working to unveil the truth about the tire tread separation tragedies.

Plaintiffs, using the civil justice system, sounded the alarm and began the process of holding the companies legally accountable for their actions. Firestone and Ford: the Tire Tread Separation Strategy; Firestone and Ford: the Tire Tread Separation Strategy says the federal government requires manufacturers to urrender adjustment data “only in the aftermath of a tragedy.

” Lawmakers have been angry about this. lawyers could read about the “Firestone Tire Tread Separation. The Firestone and Ford tire controversy was a period of unusually high failures of P/75R15 ATX, ATX II, Boyden, a researcher for State Farm Insurance, received a call from a claims handler asking for information about tread separation in Firestone tires.

View Notes - The Firestone and Ford Case (1) from BMA at Tasmania. I FIRESTONE AND FORD: THE TIRE TREAD SEPARATION TRAGEDY It is often tricky to know when an ethical or social issue.

Case 22 Analysis Firestone and Ford; The Tire Tread Separation Tragedy 1.

Firestone and ford the tire tread separation tragedy

What are the major and minor ethical issues involved in this case? The major ethical issue is Ford and Firestone’s negligence of the technical problems.

They knew that something was wrong yet they did not do anything about it and therefore ignored their consumers’ safety and health.

Firestone and Ford: The Tire Tread Separation Tragedy It is often tricky to know when an ethical Firestone and Ford: The Tire Tread Separation Tragedy It is often tricky to know when an ethical or social issue really begins.

Firestone and Ford: the Tire Tread Separation Strategy - New York Essays